Hi
I thinks that we need a new way to define local protocols, each installation needs its own specification, how work its codes, what is mandatory, the meaning of text fields as «definition», etc. If I understand correctly, the proposal for protocol will be a «for installation» definition, and it should be a complementary information of the general and global definition. The main ontology definitions need to be written in a general point of view, but the protocol needs to be specific point of view.
In other words, a protocol should be a extension the ontology definition.
I agree with these concept, but we need to add this feature in a correct way.
I will back with a more specific plan.
Best