Dependencies are a high valuable information for many sectiions like 'publications' or 'inmovable heritage. I wonder if the field dependency should be included in the respective lists view of those sections.
In the case of Publications, for instance, when a paper has a dependency of a journal seems important to show this info. In the list of publications 'code', 'edition', or 'standard number seem less relevant. If this is possible authorship, year, title, dependency seem to be the standard arrangement of bibliograsphic entries.
Dependency is also important for the tchi1 list, but in this case i'm not sure about the changes / arrangement.
