Restoration / Conservation sections

Manuel Gozalbes

We have started introducing the restoration data in the new tch1 model. It constitutes a great improvement in comparison to our previous section in the mupreva ontology. I would like to make some suggestions about the structure, labels and components of this sections.

The sections related with conservation are included under the resources menu. Maybe the group fits better under the activities menu, due that restoration processes are are always and activity related with the objects. And also, if only one word describes the group, maybe conservation is more wide and precise but restoration seems to be more clear for the users.
If this solution is adopted it's interesting also to rename the restoration section (rsc550) as intervention, the name that is used in the portal of tch1. Doing this the first group of the section should be renamed as identification avoiding the repetition of intervention
Following this model the terms of the tab conservation and restoration can be reversed into restoration and conservation. Not better, but follows the general model.
Is it also a good idea to rename the five official conservation thesauri with the prefix res?
In tch1 the first group under the conservation/restoration tab (actual estate) can be renamed as preventive conservation.
The portal conservation and recomendation parameters (tch508) can be shortened as conservation recommendations (the actual length is very long for the filter, takes up too much space). In this section seems also necessary to create a new field for setting a title.
It's ok if the field Handling, transport, exposure specifications is deprecated because, in fact, similar fields are included above under the Inspections / Conservation state section.
The final group STATUS PRIOR TO INCORPORATION INTO THE COLLECTION is very close in concept to the contents of the section Inspections / Conservation state. I suggest to remove those fields and to use for that info the portal inspections.... By doing so both groups are merged to get together an historical register of this info. The field Historical interventions (tch498) seems relevant and maybe it's a good option to move to the section Inspections / Conservation state.
A couple of changes may help to display more relevant info in the portal inspections.... Perhaps a good solution is to show this arrangement of the fields:
Date / Intervention urgency / Historical intervention / Pathology Technical (person?) / Images / Audiovisual.
The section inspection... Maybe needs to split cause and pathologies into two separate fields linking only to the specific thesauri created for these topics.
In the section intervention (rsc550) is necessary the field for the publication control. Also the Process type (rsc615) field of the portal shows a list instead of the values from the cotreatment thesaurus.

Alex

Lot of changes.

Manuel Gozalbes better under the activities menu,

Done.

Manuel Gozalbes ename the restoration section (rsc550) as intervention

Done.

Manuel Gozalbes he first group of the section should be renamed as identification avoiding the repetition of intervention

Done

Manuel Gozalbes the tab conservation and restoration can be reversed into restoration and conservation

Done

Manuel Gozalbes rename the five official conservation thesauri with the prefix res

Done, but, if you have a previous thesaurus with old tld you will need to change it or update your data:

old tld	new tld
coanalysis	resanalysis
cocause	rescause
comaterial	resmaterial
copathology	respathology
cotreatment	restreatment

Is necessary create an update?

Manuel Gozalbes In tch1 the first group under the conservation/restoration tab (actual estate) can be renamed as preventive conservation

Done.

Manuel Gozalbes The portal conservation and recomendation parameters (tch508) can be shortened as conservation recommendations

Done.

Manuel Gozalbes the field Handling, transport, exposure specifications is deprecated because, in fact, similar fields are included above under the Inspections / Conservation state section

Removed. but if you have data into this filed move it previously to the inspections/conservation portal.

As the tch1 is a beta, is necessary an update with this changes?

Manuel Gozalbes remove those fields and to use for that info the portal inspections...

Done. but if you have data into this filed move it previously to the inspections/conservation portal.

As the tch1 is a beta, is necessary an update with this changes?

Manuel Gozalbes he field Historical interventions (tch498) seems relevant and maybe it's a good option to move to the section Inspections / Conservation state

Done.

Manuel Gozalbes A couple of changes may help to display more relevant info in the portal inspections.... Perhaps a good solution is to show this arrangement of the fields:
Date / Intervention urgency / Historical intervention / Pathology Technical (person?) / Images / Audiovisual

Done

Manuel Gozalbes The section inspection... Maybe needs to split cause and pathologies into two separate fields linking only to the specific thesauri created for these topics.

Done

Manuel Gozalbes In the section intervention (rsc550) is necessary the field for the publication control.

Done

Manuel Gozalbes Also the Process type (rsc615) field of the portal shows a list instead of the values from the cotreatment thesaurus.

Done, but the only for v6, v5 versions will continue to use the Restoration processes (dd516) list.

All changes was done into the ontology:

Dédalo 2024-06-06T19:44:09+02:00 Benimamet

Update your installation to get it.

Best

Alex

Manuel Gozalbes Is it also a good idea to rename the five official conservation thesauri with the prefix res?

As agreed in Lisbon, the thesaurus resanalisys has been moved to labanalysis.

old tld	new tld
resanalysis	labanalysis

It was included into the official hierarchies to be installed and is not set an update as restoration section because it is in beta state.

Best

Manuel Gozalbes

The images (rsc587) of the 'intervention' section (rsc550) are displayed in list mode, so are very small. Is it possible to change the visualization to a gallery similar to the field for general images of the second tab (tch141)?
It also seems that the 'intervention' section needs a field for including a brief and clear explanation of the intervention.
Ramon also suggests to include a new field for placing information related with topography (ubication1) in the section ínspections`(rsc976). This information can be useful for tracking the conservation conditions of the spaces of the museum.

Manuel Gozalbes

Great. Thank you!
In our case we don't need an update with this changes.