@Alex @elena @Enric Tartera @MercePB @Manuel Gozalbes
Summary about our first Archaeological Friday, dedicated to data uncertainty:
@Manuel Gozalbes presented a proposal for a thesaurus to categorise data uncertainty, emphasising that it is a work in progress and has to be discussed.
He demonstrated how the thesaurus is applied to numismatics, suggesting that having five levels of data uncertainty may be excessive and that three levels might suffice.
He also expressed that maybe "data uncertainty" is a concept too restrictive, and we are going toward a "data frame" that could be useful to explain different aspects of the data, as for example, to be reviewed, need more research, etc.
We agreed on:
Continue the data uncertainty / data frame discussion on the AGORA
Share in the agora the proposal of the thesaurus that numismatics is using, so we can discuss it and arrive at a consensus on a thesaurus that is shared with all projects (as toponymy). Maybe we could share a document.
We skip the December archaeological meeting. The next meeting will be held on the 16th January. We will announce it in this Agora.
@Alex or @PaCo, can you please create the label for Archaeological Friday meetings? (no hurry on that)
Thank you!!