Step by step. A first general question is whether the Interventions section should be named as rsc in the ontology or whether it should have a different locator. In my opinion, it is more closely related to activities than to resources, so the actv locator fits well with the definition of the section.
There are different types of activities that relate to heritage in different ways: they disseminate it (exhibitions, workshops, conferences...), change its ownership (auctions), or modify it (excavations, restorations).
Interventions [rsc550] are related to this latter group and do not carry either a positive or negative connotation. I suggest some minor modifications to the Interventions section to give it a more generic character, adaptable to different circumstances.
It is necessary to add a new typology component that allows for a description of the type of intervention (excavation, works on a site, restoration, act of vandalism, etc.).
The Responsible [rsc845] and Restorers/Restaurateur [rsc565] components are too rigid in certain situations. The best solution would be the same as in other sections, where a generic persons portal with roles and persons offers the flexibility needed to describe diverse situations.
Is it also necessary a portal for entities?. I'm not sure.
It may be useful to add a component for the location the work being carried out. For interventions on immovable tchi, the location is clear, but for movable tch, it might be helpful to document the department or laboratory where the intervention takes place.
Add a title component, which is always useful as a synthesis of the record’s content.
The textual description of the whole thing maybe needs two parts. First to shorten / change the name Conservation status / diagnosis [rsc564] component just to diagnosis or cause, as it sounds more general. The purpose of this component is to describe the state of the things / the problem / the plan, BEFORE the intervention (it seems to be related with the reason [rsc562] component). The second part is to add a description component. This is intended for a general text to describe the intervention AFTER it has taken place. I'm not sure if we can tag more clearly these fields to describe the situation as PRE intervention and POST intervention, as this is the essence of the section, the modification of heritage elements.
The exhibitions component seems too specific. Remove? Rethink?
In documentation, the last tab of the record, to move the portal images to the first position, and to rename attached documentationto documentation.
