Hello!

@rca @Markus @elena @Ruth @Manuel Gozalbes

We are preparing the next step into certainty/uncertainty in the next version, as we discuss some times, the uncertainty needs more information about it. @Manuel Gozalbes proposed ratting it with "5 stars" levels. And we think that it will be ok, but two questions arise to us:

1- What ratting levels means?

Option 1: Manuel proposal a 5 star levels, but 100% will not represented in the ratting because this data will not has any certainty mark, so the rating will be only with 4 stars:

1 star = 0% sure
2 stars = 25 % sure
3 stars = 50 % sure
4 stars = 75 % sure
100 % sure (data without uncertainty)

So a 4 stars ratting the 1 star = 0% (totally unsure) and 4 stars = 75% (nearly to be sure) and the 100% the rest unmarked data.

Option 2: But other rating could be a 5 stars ratting and the un-ratting means totally unsure (0%)

0% sure (data with uncertainty but without ratting)
1 star = 16,66 % sure
2 stars = 33,33 % sure
3 stars = 50 % sure
4 stars = 66,66 % sure
5 stars = 83,33 % sure
100 % sure (data without uncertainty)

Or... do you have another proposal?

2- How can evaluated the current check box with the new rating?

Now, the checkbox can be on or off, which could be interpreted as 0/100. But... we want to ask you.
So, the current activated checkbox for uncertainty shall have the value?

Option 1 - without rating (I will rated in 4 stars ratting / 0% in the 5 starts ratting)
Option 2 - 1 star (the most low level)
Option 3 - 3 stars (middle) 50%

Option 1 means that the current value creates an uncertainty record but any value will be assigned to the ratting
Option 2 means that the current value has almost 1 star (or the most low level of certainty)

???

We need to take a decision quickly...so please speak now or forever hold your peace. 😉 🤔 👂️
...

Best